INVENTOR'S 'IMPOSSIBLE' PROPULSION SYSTEM (OURS) PROVEN TO WORK BY NASA

Share

ION DRIVE PROPULSION CAR.png

Can ion thrust be amplified enough to lift objects in Earth's atmosphere? YES! It already has been achieved! Ion thrusters are now in use on spacecraft and on Earth. The key to domestic use is the amplifier. Much like a PA system amplifies sound radiation, an ion amplifier can deliver amazing new opportunities. Combined with high energy ultra-sonics, a whole new kind of systemology is possible!

 

ISSUED USPTO PATENT FILING DATE: November 2002

COMPETITOR FILING FOR MICRO-THRUSTERS FILING DATE:  September 26, 2006

120 OTHER COMPETITOR PATENT FILINGS AND WHITE-PAPERS RSEARCHED AND NONE, SO FAR, HAVE PROVEN EARLIER DATES

INVENTOR'S 'IMPOSSIBLE' PROPULSION SYSTEM PROVEN TO BE 'THE REAL DEAL' BY NASA

To win this patent award from the U.S. Government the inventor had to:

# 1.) Prove that the invention was better than any invention NASA had previously filed. THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT!!!

# 2.) Prove that the aircraft and vehicles could fly without wings. THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT!!!

# 3.) Prove that it could work. THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT!!! After stating that the "technology was potentially 'impossible' in a notorious 'invention-letter-of-death' from the Patent Office, the inventor sent the U.S. Patent Office Director and Staff a video of one of the aircraft flying around in the conference room of Intel's lead patent team and then offered a demonstration to the U.S. Patent office of one of the devices flying in the Rotunda of the White House in Washington, DC. The inventor and third party Silicon Valley lawyer/observers swore, warranted and certified that the device was flying under electronic propulsion with no additional wires, cords, propellors or jets supporting it.

Commercial delivery of the technology to the public now only depends on next-stage commercialization funding and factory production.

EM DRIVE PANEL PROCESS.png

INVENTOR'S 'IMPOSSIBLE' PROPULSION SYSTEM PROVEN TO BE 'THE REAL DEAL' BY NASA

To win this patent award from the U.S. Government the inventor had to:

# 1.) Prove that the invention was better than any invention NASA had previously filed. THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT!!!

# 2.) Prove that the aircraft and vehicles could fly without wings. THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT!!!

# 3.) Prove that it could work. THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT!!! After stating that the "technology was potentially 'impossible' in a notorious 'invention-letter-of-death' from the Patent Office, the inventor sent the U.S. Patent Office Director and Staff a video of one of the aircraft flying around in the conference room of Intel's lead patent team and then offered a demonstration to the U.S. Patent office of one of the devices flying in the Rotunda of the White House in Washington, DC. The inventor and third party Silicon Valley lawyer/observers swore, warranted and certified that the device was flying under electronic propulsion with no additional wires, cords, propellors or jets supporting it.

Commercial delivery of the technology to the public now only depends on next-stage commercialization funding and factory production.

Our team holds multiple issued and pending patents as well as trade secret disclosures and working prototypes on the technology suite.

EmDrive

EMDRIVE’S THRUST AND THE BIEFELD-BROWN EFFECT

NASA’s Peer-Reviewed EmDrive Paper Has Finally Been Published

After months of speculation and leaked documents, NASA’s long-awaited EmDrive paper has finally been peer-reviewed and published:

EmDrive

oDllYjXP_C_uba8C04hSzjl72eJkfbmt4t8yenImKBVvK0kTmF0xjctABnaLJIm9

THE BIEFELD-BROWN EFFECT :

brown-bb

From the 1st of Feb. till the 1st of March in 1996,  the research group of the HONDA R&D Institute conducted experiments to verify the Biefeld-Brown effect with an improved experimental device to reject the influence of corona discharges and electric wind around the capacitor by setting the capacitor in the insulator oil contained within a metallic vessel. They found that the weight loss by an alternate electric field, i.e. the dynamical effect, was greater than by the static one:

EmDrive’s thrust

If we place a solid dielectric inside the EmDrive’s cavity then, essentially, we will have an asymmetric capacitor subjected to electromagnetic radiation, i.e. the dynamical Biefeld-Brown effect (the Abraham force).

What if we do not place a solid dielectric inside the EmDrive’s cavity? Then EmDrive’s thrust is still due to the Abraham force, because the Abraham force appears not only in solid dielectrics, but also in liquid and gasdielectrics, like air in the EmDrive’s cavity.

nasa

NASA — National Aeronautics and Space Administration

It is a well established fact in the literature, that a force, or thrust, may be generated by a capacitor charged to a high potential [ the Biefeld-Brown effect ]. Although there are different theories regarding the basis for this phenomenon, there is no dispute that a force, or thrust, is generated by capacitors under such high voltages. However, the thrust generated by such high potential capacitors has been minimal and thus this phenomenon has had very limited practical utility:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7kgKijo-p0ibm94VUY0TVktQlU/view

https://imgoat.com/uploads/723d092b63/108426.png

 

Share this:

  1.  

    tldr Thrust data from forward, reverse, and null suggested that the system was consistently performing at 1.2±0.1  mN/kW, which was very close to the average impulsive performance measured in air…The current state-of–the-art thrust to power for a Hall thruster is on the order of 60  mN/kW. This is an order of magnitude higher than the test article evaluated during the course of this vacuum campaign; however, for missions with very large delta-v requirements, having a propellant consumption rate of zero could offset the higher power requirements. The 1.2  mN/kW performance parameter is over two orders of magnitude higher than other forms of “zero-propellant” propulsion, such as light sails, laser propulsion, and photon rockets having thrust-to-power levels in the 3.33–6.67  μN/kW (or 0.0033–0.0067  mN/kW) range.

    Electric Spacecraft Are Now The Norm. No Longer Science Fiction

     

     
     
    BepiColombo approaching Mercury
     
     
     

    BepiColombo, the joint ESA/JAXA spacecraft on a mission to Mercury, is now firing its thrusters for the first time in flight.

    On Sunday, BepiColombo carried out the first successful manoeuver using two of its four electric propulsion thrusters. After more than a week of testing which saw each thruster individually and meticulously put through its paces, the intrepid explorer is now one step closer to reaching the innermost planet of the Solar System.

    Twin ion thrusters firing

    BepiColombo left Earth on 20 October 2018, and after the first few critical days in space and the initial weeks of in-orbit commissioning, its Mercury Transfer Module (MTM) is now revving up the high-tech ion thrusters.

    The most powerful and high-performance electric propulsion system ever flown, these electric blue thrusters had not been tested in space until now.

    It is these glowing power-packs that will propel the two science orbiters – the Mercury Planetary Orbiter and Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter – on the seven-year cruise to the least explored planet of the inner Solar System.

    “Electric propulsion technology is very novel and extremely delicate,” explains Elsa Montagnon, Spacecraft Operations Manager for BepiColombo.

    “This means BepiColombo’s four thrusters had to be thoroughly checked following the launch, by slowly turning each on, one by one, and closely monitoring their functioning and effect on the spacecraft.”

    BepiColombo images high-gain antenna

    Testing took place during a unique window, in which BepiColombo remained in continuous view of ground-based antennas and communications between the spacecraft and those controlling it could be constantly maintained.

     

    The first fire

    On 20 November at 11:33 UTC (12:33 CET), the first of BepiColombo’s thrusters entered Thrust Mode with a force of 75 mN (millinewtons). With this BepiColombo was firing in space for the very first time.

    Three hours later, the newly awakened thruster was really put through its paces as commands from mission control directed it to go full throttle, ramping up to 125mN – equivalent to holding an AAA battery at sea level.

    This may not sound like much, but this thruster was now working at the maximum thrust planned to be used during the life of the mission.

    Views of ESA's 35m ESTRACK deep-space tracking station at Malargüe, Argentina, now supporting many of the Agency's most important exploration missions, including Rosetta, Mars Express, ExoMars, LISA Pathfinder and Gaia.
    ESA Malargüe tracking station

    Thrust mode was maintained for five hours before BepiColombo transitioned back to Normal Mode. The entire time, ESA’s Malargüe antenna in Argentina was in communication with the now glowing blue spacecraft – the colour of the plasma generated by the thruster as it burned through the xenon propellant.

    These steps were then repeated for each of the other three thrusters over the next days, having only a tiny effect on BepiColombo’s overall trajectory.

    The small effects that were observed allowed the Flight Dynamics team to assess the thruster performance in precise detail: analysis of the first two firings reveals that the spacecraft was performing within 2% of its expected value. Analysis of the last two firings is ongoing.

     
     
     
     
     
     
    Animation visualising BepiColombo’s journey to Mercury

    “To see the thrusters working for the first time in space was an exciting moment and a big relief. BepiColombo’s seven year trip to Mercury will include 22 ion thrust arcs – and we absolutely need healthy and well performing thrusters for this long trip,” explains Paolo Ferri, ESA’s Head of Operations.

    “Each thruster burn arc will last for extended periods of up to two months, providing the same acceleration from less fuel compared to traditional, high-energy chemical burns that last for minutes or hours.”

    During each long-duration burn the engines do take eight hour pauses, once a week, to allow the ground to perform navigation measurements in quiet dynamic conditions.

    The first routine electric propulsion thrust arc will begin on 17 December, steering BepiColombo on its interplanetary trajectory and optimising its orbit ahead of its swing-by of Earth in April 2020.

    BepiColombo Earth flyby

    Travelling some nine billion kilometers in total, BepiColombo will take nine flybys at Earth, Venus and Mercury, looping around the Sun 18 times.

    By late 2025 the transfer module’s work will be done: it will separate, allowing the two science orbiters to be captured by Mercury’s gravity, studying the planet and its environment, along with its interaction with the solar wind, from complementary orbits.

    "We put our trust in the thrusters and they have not let us down. We are now on our way to Mercury with electro-mobility,” concludes Günther Hasinger, ESA Director of Science.

    “This brings us an important step closer to unlocking the secrets of the mysterious innermost planet and ultimately, the formation of our Solar System.”

    Follow ESA Operations on twitter for updates on BepiColombo’s journey, as well as the latest from ESA’s mission control.

    #EuropesGatewayToSpace